ULTRA com Jarvis no ar·50% off nos 3 primeiros meses em qualquer plano·cupom DESCONTO50 aplicado automático
squadssquad for sites
Overclock Original

Cinema Site

You explain the site you want. The team handles the look, the copy, the images, the page, and the review.

A squad is a ready-made AI team inside Overclock. Each AI handles one part of the project. You talk to the maestro; it splits the work and merges everything at the end.

To start, you answer 6 questions and show a reference. Before the build, you approve a preview with colors, fonts, and the headline. At the end, you get the reviewed site on desktop and mobile.

on Boost Pro, R$ 98,50/mês nos 3 primeiros meses7 published deliveries
real deliveryopen project
Orbe — landing premium de produto entregue pelo squad Cinema Site: anel de titânio, hero nível Apple
OrbeLanding premium para um anel inteligente conceitual, com direção editorial e visual de produto como protagonista.
questions to start
6
images in the same style
6
work steps
3
approval points
2
how it works · no jargon

What happens after you ask for the site.

The maestro is the AI that organizes the team. You talk to it; it turns the request into tasks, tracks each part, and gathers the result. You don't have to coordinate each AI yourself.

imagine you say
“I want a site to sell my course. I like the look of this link. The main button should lead to sign-up.”
here's what Cinema Site does

One AI studies the look. Another writes the copy. Another builds the page. Others create the images. Review opens everything on desktop and mobile.

  1. 01

    You answer 6 questions

    Say who the site is for, what it sells, what parts it needs, where the content comes from, what look to follow, and where to publish.

  2. 02

    The maestro splits the request

    It turns your answers into tasks and hands each part to the right AI. You don’t coordinate the team.

  3. 03

    You approve the look

    Before the page is assembled, you see colors, fonts, and the headline. Work only continues after your “yes.”

  4. 04

    The team builds the site

    One AI assembles the page while others create the 6 images in the same style.

  5. 05

    Review tests and delivers

    The site is opened on desktop and mobile. Issues go back for fixes before the final URL.

You decide what you want and approve the important moments. The maestro handles the coordination between the AIs.

7 published deliveries

See six sites this squad already shipped.

Each one started with a request and a reference. The team handled the look, the copy, the images, the page, and the review.

want the same process on your project?You say what you want. The team handles the creation and the testing.
Subscribe and run this squadon Boost Pro, R$ 98,50/mês nos 3 primeiros meses
what you get

The finished site — and proof it was reviewed.

The work doesn't end in a chat reply. You get files, previews, and links you can open, review, and use.

  • Live site

    A link to open and browse the complete site.

    See technical details

    Site no ar com preview clicável: DESIGN.md + copy consumidos verbatim, 1 DNA estrutural de um catálogo de 15 layouts

  • Look approved before the build

    A preview with colors, fonts, and the headline before the page is assembled.

    See technical details

    Styleboard antes de qualquer build: paleta aplicada, tipografia viva e a headline real — você aprova a alma do site primeiro

  • Own images

    Six images created for the page, all following the same look.

    See technical details

    6 imagens geradas em paralelo com 1 estética só (Style Block verbatim em cada agente) — mídia própria, nunca stock

  • Review with proof

    Tests, desktop and mobile captures, and a list of the issues found.

    See technical details

    Prova de entrega: checklist ✅/❌, screenshots desktop + mobile, Lighthouse e findings rastreáveis

how the squad works

Want to see the technical part? Open each step.

Here you see which AIs step in at each moment and what they produce. Details start collapsed so they don’t get in the way of the simple explanation.

  1. 01step 1Look and copy4 parts done by the team
    • oc-design-scout

      live design DNA: DOM + screenshots → DESIGN.md, tokens, manifest

    • oc-copywriter

      voice → offer angle → section-by-section copy → CTA already wired

    • oc-browser

      maps the content source via text snapshot

    • packager

      waits for DNA + copy → renders the STYLEBOARD

    your approval

    Styleboard — is this the soul of the site? No build before approval.

  2. 02step 2Build3 parts done by the team
    • oc-frontend

      consumes DESIGN.md + copy.md verbatim · 1 structural DNA out of 15 · anti-AI blacklist

    • oc-media×6

      Style Block verbatim → lint → generate → look at the PNG → assets/

    • packager

      build + images → deploy preview

  3. 03step 3Review3 parts done by the team
    • oc-qa funcional

      layer 0: curl + console · layer 1: text snapshot

    • oc-qa vitals

      headless Lighthouse: performance, accessibility

    • oc-qa visual

      only after layer 1: 1 desktop shot + 1 mobile shot as verdict

    your approval

    Definitive URL + 5-line manual.

session recorded in logs

4 sites num dia — e o QA carimbou REPROVADO em dois deles antes de você ver

Runs de 12/07/2026, reconstruídos dos relatórios de QA, dos arquivos entregues e do registro de custo por chamada. Todo número abaixo tem fonte.

sites completos entregues no mesmo dia, numa janela de 1h30
4
reprovações de QA registradas — as duas corrigidas antes da entrega
2
da reprovação ao fix aplicado na linha exata que o reviewer apontou
~5min
achados críticos no run que passou de primeira
0
Open the full session record
chamadas de modelo no run mais denso — 291k tokens de saída
569
custo real de modelo por run, conforme a complexidade do brief
US$ 4,83–69,56
  1. 21:16 — o QA carimba REPROVADO num portfólio: um seletor CSS sem escopo grudava os links do rodapé no topo da página. O relatório aponta a causa raiz na linha exata (style.css:55) e sugere o fix.
  2. 21:20 — quatro minutos depois, a versão corrigida está no arquivo, com o fix idêntico ao que o reviewer sugeriu.
  3. Outro site perdeu a 1ª rodada de QA por seção faltante: o contrato de design previa 9 seções, o build entregou 8. O builder implementou a que faltava — 2ª rodada: PASS.
  4. E um terceiro passou de primeira: zero achados críticos, só 3 ajustes menores de polimento. QA de verdade reprova quando tem que reprovar — e assina quando não tem.

O Orbe — a landing de produto que abre esta página — é o case público de vitrine do squad. O processo descrito acima vem dos runs registrados em log no mesmo dia.

ready to run

Your next site starts with a reference and six answers.

On Boost Pro, you call Cinema Site, watch the team work, and approve the direction before publishing.

on Boost Pro, R$ 98,50/mês nos 3 primeiros meses